RELOAD

RETURN TO THE HUB PAGE

"HOW ALL OF THIS CAME ABOUT"


ADVANCE APOLOGY: This file was originally put together by copying pieces of numerous e-mails into one "biography," covering close to 30 years of events. Each "thread" weaves together to form the person I am today; but, trying to fit together decades of ones life into a synopsis has inherent pitfalls. One of the worst of these is a certain amount of disjointedness. Over time, I've tried to make it read more smoothly; but, a certain amount of jumping back and forth on the time line is unavoidable. I apologize in advance for any headaches one might get from trying to read it. ;-p) QUESTION: Will you tell me about yourself, how you began all this, and why... and maybe what you personally benefit from all this, morally, spiritually etc., and maybe a bit about you personally. it's a little confusing for me to understand how and why a person would wish to administer corporal punishment to another. I hope I do not offend you by asking, as I know I am the one that contacted you, but I just need to get to know you more, okay? ANSWER: R: No problem! It's such a commonly asked question that I'm not only not offended; but, have answered it so many times that I can just "copy and paste" most of the answer. {smile} I'm 45 (46 in March, 2000) and run an organization called Citizens For Effective Justice, which evolved out of a book I wrote in 1994, about how we could reduce crime and prison overcrowding. In some ways, this system is tougher than what we currently have; but, in many others, it's a lot more compassionate. One of the primary underlying problems with our current system is that we have a :"Catch 22" that boils down to, "If you incarcerate a non-hardened offender, more often than not, you get back a hard- core criminal (or, someone who's been so traumatized by their contact with fellow inmates that their chances for much of any long-term sucess are still pretty dismal); but, on the other hand, if you just put them on probation with the intermediary sanctions which are currently availible to our courts, it's a total joke to most of them; and only perpetuates the cycle until most of them are irretrievible." Back when I was 18, I spent 5 and a half months as a part of a street patrol (in this case, aka. "vigillante." {shrug}) group which "cleaned up" our section of the town I lived in, using some of the harsher elements of the system which I now advocate (I've made some major changes in the one I now advocate; but, this one did have its original roots in that earlier one.) Out of that time, we had only TWO people whom we had to handle twice... Even though we were a rather motley assortment of folks, efforts were made to be fair; and, there was an unbendable rule that anyone who voted on a punishment had to witness it being carried out (which ties in later on in all of this...) An intresting side note to that time is that a gal whom we'd caught for selling heroin; whom we then wound up taking in and helping to kick her habit, eventually joined up with us. Silver (her nick name) initially just helped out with the meal we put on in the park every evening; but, after a while, decided to train with us to pick up some self-defense. From there, she went from just tagging along quite a bit to being fully active with the patrol. We wound up partnering up quite a bit, since I'd been the one who'd originally made the offer (while guarding her while we were waiting for her sentence to be decided) that if she really DID want to kick and get away from the scumbag she was dealing for, we'd do everything we could to help her. About 3 1/2 months after the night we'd busted her, she described that night as "The absolute worst night of my life; AND, absolutely the best thing that ever happened to me..." I think this, combined with her being really tough on the people who's sentences she voted on and the fact that she was still clean the last time I was in contact with her (3 years later), had a fairly profound effect on me. When I left there, I came back to Oklahoma, became a lot less radical, got married, etc., and had pretty well put all of that behind me until one night in '78, when I caught a fellow with my motorcycle pushed about halfway out my front gate. He begged me not to call the police and laid such a sob story on me that I decided to give him a choice -- either I could call the police and they could handle things; OR, *I* could take care of the situation myself... He opted for the latter. I didn't have any of the heavier (low voltage type) cord that the fellow who had done these whippings (back in '72) had made his whip from; so, I cut up a flat extension cord and bumped the number of lashes that I would have felt appropriate (back in '72) up from 20 to 30, to compensate for the differences between the whips and my size. This is where I discovered that the lighter cord actually does one heck of a lot more damage to a person's skin than the low-voltage cable does... Suffice it to say that before I was finished he was really wishing that he'd opted for going to jail... I also learned that anger only carries a person so far in carrying out one of these whippings... I finished it; but, the last few certainly didn't match the force of the first few... Again, all of this just went back into the catagory of "history," with the exception of my using a set of handcuffs to lock the back wheel of my motorcycle to its frame. In '79, I got hooked on jumping out of airplanes; going on to get my jumpmaster rating in late '80. In April of '81, after one of the friendliest divorces in history, I moved to Z-Hills, Florida, to Ridgly,Maryland, back to Deland, Florida, then to Dickenson, Texas -- working at various skydiving centers. The primary relevence of this tidbit is that working with student skydivers taught me a lot of things about helping people to overcome their fears in order to accomplish their objectives, which aren't all that different from some of the techniques which I use with my clients today.... In '84, I was going to college at TSTI in Waco, Tx., learning to fly airplanes, with the intent of eventually going into corporate avaiation. TSTI had an excellent aviation program; but, other than that (and two or three of the other programs), it was pretty well a "party school" for a lot of overgrown teenagers and folks who'd partied their way out of other colleges. As a very serious 30 year old adult, who was doggedly intent upon maintaining as close to a 4.0 GPA as possible, I gave housing major fits trying to come up with a roommate that I wouldn't run off. {smirk} Finally, they matched me up with a gal who had quite a few years of recovery in AA and NA; and, who was really serious about being there to actually learn something, as well. This match worked out and we were roommates throughout her time there. Since I was also a "non-party'er," I took to hanging out a lot with her and her friends, most all of whom were in either AA or NA; and, going to some of their meeting and functions with her. I learned a lot and made some really good friends, some of whom I'm still in contact with. I had finished all of my classwork, had about 120 flight hours and my private pilot's license; plus, my writtens passed for my commercial, instrument, and CFI ratings in '86; but, I was having a very hard time coming up with the money to pay the $37 / hour solo and $52 / hour dual time I needed to finish the flight hours required to graduate. Through a chain of events, I wound up chasing bond jumpers in an attempt to come up with that money. It didn't pay for the flying I needed; but, I got sort of hooked on it and developed an interest in law enforcement and criminal justice. It also taught me one heck of a lot. I started thinking about eventually combining them with flying, first to perhaps fly in some law enforcement capacity; then, going into corporate with the sideline of executive security and protection. In spite of any protrayals to the contrary, tracking involves a LOT of sitting around in absolute boredom, watching a house, etc.; so, when working with a partner (which I sometimes did) you get to the point where you've heard each other's "life story" 19 times over, run out of things to talk about; so, the tendency is to start (verbally) "fixing the world..." {grin} Out of some of those discussions, some of the other groundwork was laid for what eventually wound up in my book. In late spring of '87, one of the AA-involved friends I'd acquired had a fellow whom he was sponsoring that was having an extremely difficult time staying sober because of some severe guilt feelings and the devastation to his self-respect which had occured as the result of them. This friend knew a little of my background, as the result of having asked me about my habit of locking my motorcycle up with a set of handcuffs. The fellow he was sponsoring had made a comment to the effect of wishing that there were still the old- style monastaries, where flogging was a common form of imposed penance, since he didn't see too much of any other way to be able to put his guilt behind him. After my friend talked to me about the situation (and, my hving some very mixed feelings about helping out, I might add...), the 3 of us wound up working what amounted to my first "guilt case..." After a couple of years of this guy not getting much over 60 to 90 days sober at a strech, he wound up staying sober this time around. (He'd had about two and a half months prior to this; but, had been headed for another relapse.) As far as I was concerned, it had been a "one time deal;" but, about a year and a half later, the first fellow I'd helped brought a fellow whom HE was now sponsoring to me, since he was having problems similar to what he'd had. Based upon how what I'd done had help him, he managed to talk me into working with this other guy... When I left Texas in late 1989, both of them were still sober and doing fairly well. It seemed that the whipping I'd given each of them had served as some sort of a turning point for them which allowed them to put their past into the past and move on into more positive directions. I still didn't have any interest in making a habit of whipping people, though... In May of '88, I met both of my bio-parents in Oklahoma, back in Okla. In Sept. of '88, my adoptive Mom died (my adoptive Dad had died in '75). I wound up inheriting the family home (in OKC), along with about 3 years of mortgage payments, which were left on it. Tracking is "feast or famine" in the money department; so, it was a real struggle trying to pay road expenses to track, my rental expenses and bills in Waco, and keep the house up here in Oklahoma. Plus, I really wanted to spend sometime getting to know my bio-folks, while they were still living. I started trying to only take on enough files to keep afloat and wrap up some of the more important one's I'd committed to working, with the intent being to be able to move back to Oklahoma. (Which I eventually did around Christmas of '89...) In mid-'89, the son of a friend of mine came home, after having spent about 9 month in a Texas prison, as the result of a burglary he'd been involved in, to obtain money for drugs. I had known the kid during his several attempts to get clean; and, when he was, he had been a fairly good kid; but, he'd had one heck of a struggle with trying to stay away from his old friends, many of whom he'd been close to since childhood. He'd drift back to them, a little at a time, wind up falling back into the "maybe just one wouldn't hurt anything...." mental trap, and wind up back into full-blown addiction. To make a long story shorter, he came out of a prison a total basket case, with severe PTSD from having been repeatedly gang-raped; his front teeth having been knocked out (the more predatory inmates will commonly do that to "new fish" to make it easier to force the inmate to perform oral sex on them); he'd had a couple of ribs cracked during his attempts to resist; etc. He would wake up in the middle of the night screaming, his whole personality had changed into one where "being tough" and "not taking any shit from anyone" had become a high priority with him; and, he found himself with a LOT of suicidal and self-destructive tendencies. During one of these suicidal bouts, his Mom (not wanting him to have to go to a state-run mental hospital, where'd just be drugged up, since drugs were a major component of his problems!) asked several of us to help her keep a watch on him for several days, while she tried to get him into a private facility which didn't just dope them up. We did; and, at one point, I found myself sitting in her floor, hugging him as he cried his eyes out in the midst of a mental flashback, and thinking back to how at least WE had had to witness the effects of any penalty which WE had imposed !!! I wondered about how some of the folks who could so self-rightously send this kid into an environment where the abuses he'd undergone were a virtual certainty (while they would've looked down their noses and probably called US "criminals" for whipping the people that we caught and tried...); would handle it if THEY had had to witness all that THEIR sentence had REALLY entailed...... Sure, he had committed the crime; and, deserved to have been punished for having done so; and, he hadn't been formally sentenced to everything which had happened to him; but, he was placed in a situation where these things were a virtual certainty; so, society's responsibility can't be totally negated... If we'd caught this kid doing a burglary, he would have been seriously whipped and he'd have had a tough time of it; but, no where approaching what had happened to him and without the serious after-effects which he was suffering. Over the years, I'd seen numerous examples of the system not working, either because of the current probation system only perpetuating the problem, leading to the person winding up in prison, anyway; or, situations such as this kid's, where the actual punishment was nothing short of draconian for the crime committed. Consequences ARE essential; but, for most crimes, they shouldn't destroy the person, their life, and their families... One exception I have to the above is exemplified by the 4th whipping that I did, in the spring of '91.... A long-time (female) friend's 12 year old daughter was raped by my friend's cousin, whom she'd been allowing to stay at her home for a while (not knowing until this had happened that he has any such inclinations...) After she found out what had happened, she was horrified and immediately threw him out of the house; but, she was also very concerned about the effects which the court process might have on her daughter, who was then 13... She turned to me for help, since she'd known me even before my time as a vigillante, knew about the guy I'd caught trying to steal my motorcycle, and knew about my later associations with law enforcement. I REALLY did NOT want to be involved in this situation; and, there was (admittedly) a side of me who was somewhat inclined to contribute to him becoming a permanent "missing person;" but, this friend was fairly insitant that she wanted to try to spare her daughter the ordeal of cross-examination and "getting raped all over again in court." SO... I snagged the cousin and gave him the choice between: A) Going to jail, with the assurance that we had someone who was willing to get himself arrested in order to "put the word out" inside the jail of what this piece of sewer scum was being held for, OR, B) 100 lashes, followed by him "voluntarily" going into pervert therapy and alcohol treatment, and NEVER having any further contact with my friend's daughter. My friend was going to keep fairly close tabs on him through their mutual family; and, even though he claimed that he was in a "black out" and didn't even remember having done it, much less having any pedophile type of thoughts, if she ever heard of him having even any POTENTIAL reoccurrances, much less actual ones, her daughter WOULD testify against him and they WOULD find a way to make sure that all of the other inmates knew what he'd done... (child molesters don't fare well in prisons.........) This is the ONLY whipping that I've ever done that I got any enjoyment out of the person's suffering, at all. I absolutely loathed this guy and what he had done; plus, his excuses, denial; and, his concern for his own well-being more than that of his victim, further "fanned the flames." I deliberately used the narrower type of cord; and, I put everything I had into each lash. Part of it was that I knew that pedophiles have a rather dismal recovery rate and I wanted him to break out into cold sweats of fear at even the sight of another kid; but, part of it was a rather dark side to myself that's only real concern if I'd killed him would've been where to have disposed of the body... So, there IS a "dark side" to me, just as there really is with everyone; and, it took some time for me to come to terms with having seen my own so clearly, since that isn't something which any of us like to have to face... As for him, he did do the follow up measures that we'd insisted upon; and, to the best of our knowledge, never molested another kid. He was killed in a car wreck a couple of years later; so, now, I don't have to worry about having potentially kept him alive by keeping him out of prison; and, thus, whether he might be doing anything else to any other kids (which DID worry me, before he died in the wreck...) I went on about my business after that, applying with OKC police department and making it through all of their screening with the exception of the uncorrected vision requirements. I was looking into ways to get laser surgery on my eyes; and, in the meantime, applied with the Lincoln County Sheriff's office. (My bio-Dad lives in Lincoln county and has given me the back corner of his 62 acres out there, where I eventually want to move...) They tentatively approved my application; but, they have a rather low turn-over rate and didn't have any openings. A friend of mine owned a security company which specialized in "cleaning out" drug and gang activity from privately run Section 8 apartment complexes; plus, did some private investigations and bodyguard work on the side; so, I went to work with him pending either an opening at Lincoln SO or being able to afford the laser surgery I'd need to qualify for OKCPD. In Jan. '92, while working a 12 hour shift in the middle of one of OKC's worst ice storms in years, I went down 2 very steep concrete steps onto my butt and had to literally crawl to a more secure location. I finished my shift and even worked another 8 months with that company; but, it turned out that I'd rather seriously ruptured the two bottom disks of my spine; so, I went into sort of downward spiral of my physical conditioning. Finally, I had little option than to admit that maybe I WASN'T "bullet-proof" and the "a stupid patch of ice" COULD "get me..." By then, I'd pretty well ground what was left of those two disks down to virtually nothing. There was some discussion of fusing them; but, a test they did to see if fusion would help indicated that it would probably only make things even worse. Anyway.... While I was off-work, that friend sold the company to a guy that I didn't like and who quickly ran it into bankruptcy. With my occupational background being primarily in fields which required being in excellent physical condition, my employment prospects weren't too great, given the shape I was in. I had money coming in from worker's comp.; but, I was on the verge of going "stir-crazy" from having very little to do after having been so active all of my life... Towards the end of '93, there was that joke of a so-called "Clinton crime bill;" and, I found myself saying, "Heck! Even ***I*** could put together a better "crime bill" than THAT!!! Too bad that no one would take me seriously..." Never one to make unfounded claims or to gripe without being willing to offer up any solutions (combined with boredom and WAY too much time on my hands... {wink}), I put together what was then little more than an editorial. With some encouragement, that developed into about a 30 page pamphlet (much of which was the basis for the "proposals" section of my book.) As the book developed, I found that (even some very mainstream) people actually WERE taking me seriously and even being extremely encouraging... Then, in the spring of '94, the Michael Faye case broke in the media. With that, I discovered that there was WAY MORE support for the concept of bringing corporal sentencing back into the US judicial system than I'd ever dreamt possible; and, I developed some concerns that, if left to others, we could wind up with caning here (which I totally oppose, due to the damage it inflicts, the difficulty of gradiating it to fit the crime, the inherent humiliation which is involved in stripping a person below the waist, etc....) Also, I didn't like the very retributionist approach of many of the folks who were endorsing bringing back corporal sentencing... I've always sort of been the type to believe that the right to bitch about a problem carries with it an inherent responsibility to work toward a solution to the problem being bitched about; so, with no one else around that I felt was particularly competent to take the lead, I took it myself... The book turned into an actual, albiet self- published (since I refuse to sell the rights to it), book... I went to print with it in April of '96, went onto the internet in July of '96, and things have been slowly growing ever since. In late spring of '94, I was going over and using a friend's computer to put my written material onto computer disk. He'd taken this 19 year old kid sort of "under his wing." Another friend of this kid's talked him into going "shopping" for a used car CD plater -- at 3am -- while it was still in a car....... They found a likely target, broke the window of the car, and were in the prcess of yanking wires, etc. to try to remove it when his friend went to get a better screwdriver to try to pry it out. While he was gone, the owner of the car and his roommate came out and held the car's doors shut until the police (whom they'd already called) arrived. The kid's "friend" hauled ass out of there; he was still in the car, trapped between the car's owner and his roommate (both of whom were pretty good sized fellows...) Long story shorter, my friend and another friend of his got the kid out on bail. It was pretty well an open and shut case; but, one in which the testimony of the victim was necessary for a conviction. The minimum the prosecutor assigned to the case was offering was 2 years. This kid was all of about 5' 6," maybe 130 pounds soaking wet, blond haired, blue eyed, couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper sack if his life depended upon it.... Well, I'm sure you get the general idea of how he would've fared in prison...... My friend with the computer asked me if I thought that I might be able to do anything to try to help the kid, since I'd become acquainted with some of the folks down at the DA's office and some of them really liked what they'd read of my manuscript. I told him that I was willing to try to help; but, the kid would have to ask for any such help himself and had to convince me that he was really serious. It was obvious that he was really scared; but, a couple of days later, he did. This particular prosecutor was one I hadn't met, though; and, she wouldn't even talk to me when I tried to approach her. Finally, I wound up talking to his victim and negotiating a deal whereby the kid would pay full restitution for the damage which had been done to the car; I'd train the guy in how to do the whipping and provide all of the equipment for it; I'd work with the kid and then bring him over there, where'd he'd get 18 lashes from his victim. In exchange, his victim would ask that the charges be dropped and decline to co-operate any further in the prosecution. We did all of that and the only problem was that the aasistant prosecutor assigned to the case about had a caniption fit over such a slam-dunk case getting yanked out from under her, even threatening to file charges on me for witness tampering. Fortunately, the DA here had read a copy of my manuscript and, according to several people I knew in his office, told her to let the matter drop. In May of '99, this kid graduated from college and has been in no further trouble. Around Easter of '95, one of my bio-half-sisters got arrested on a drug charge. Due to already being on a 7 year deferred adjudication for a couple of previous drug arrests and the amount of drugs involved, that prosecutor was talking a MINIMUM of 8 years before she'd even be eligible for a parole. She was threatening suicide if she went to prison at all. Our Mom called me and asked if I could or would do anything... Again, my answer was "I'm willing to try; but, she has to ask me herself..." We went up to visit her, I gave her the run down, and asked her if she wanted me to try to see what I could do. I had some very mixed feelings about trying to help; since she was a family member (although a rather recently acquired one whom I hadn't had just a whole lot of contact with), which opened up questions of objectivity and conflict of interest. Plus, she was the type who could quote the "NORML" handbook virtually line for line; so, I really wasn't too sure that I wanted her to be a "test case" for the system I was working on developing. Over those next few months, I had to do some serious soul-searching about all of the elements involved. I had put her in touch with an attorney who'd helped a lot with the book and was willing to try to help get waivers approved; I recruited and trained a couple of people to work her case, in case it went through, etc.; but, I still wasn't comfortable with having her as my first official test case. Things went up to the wire, with the head prosecutor over the drug unit willing to go with her attorney to talk to the DA about approving waivers (the same DA who'd told the other prosecutor to back off...) Suddenly, the prosecutor assigned to the case suddenly went from being unwilling to budge off of the 8 years before any chance of parole to an offer of 20 years suspended and 90 nights of night jail. LOL, needless to say, EVERYONE (myself included) was extremely relived when she took this offer. When I put up the first web site, I hadn't given much thought to going ahead and trying to get other test cases in the near future, it was mainly intended to promote the book and to get the information out to the public, to generate pressure towards legislation. Rep. Tom Cameron of Mississippi had filed the bill earlier that year and had enough committed votes in both thier house and senate for its passage; but, Rep. Ed Blackmon, the chairman of their Judiciary B committee had refused to allow it to go to the floor for a vote. In less than a month of having the web site, though, I was contacted by a gal fron Arizona who was guilty of embezzeling about $2,600 from her boss, with the intent of replacing it before she was discoovered, to pay a private investigator for assistance in a rather nasty custody battle over her 2 young daughters. After visiting with her rather extensively, I agreed to try to help her. The fellow she had worked for was fairly good friends with the judge in the small town they lived in; and, he was far more interested in getting his money back than he was in seeing her sent to prison; so, he turned out to be an allie. Her attorney thought she was stark raving nuts; but, finally, agreed to assist in a deal whereby she would borrow the money to repay her ex-boss, drive to Oklahoma, and bring back a tape proving that she'd gotten 20 lashes. In exchange, she'd be put on probation instead of going to prison and losing custody of her her girls to her emotionally abusive ex-husband. She's now living in Tucson with her daughters and has also stayed out of trouble ever since. From there, things just slowly started snowballing along. Almost from the very beginning, I was getting occassional querries about working guilt cases; but, I was really reluctant to do so. Eventually, though, a combination of the desperation of some of the folks who contacted me and the good results of the two cases back in the late '80's, I started taking on some of the more desperate requests. Still, I was reluctant to make it commonly known that I'd do so, since these sort of cases aren't our primary focus and I'm not "into" whipping people. Along the way, though, one of my guilt clients told me of how he'd come very close to putting a bullet in his head, in between a really bad experience that occurred from trying to go to a dominatrix (which did virtually nothing to get rid of his guilt) and later finding the CFEJ web site. This guilt program seems to have worked rather well for him; and, I'd heard of other bad experiences people had gone through from trying to deal with their feelings by going to folks who were involved in s&m. These had ranged from just being ineffective to being outright abusive. Anyway, I finally got to thinking that there could very well be people out there who are just as desperate as that fellow was; so, I broke down, put the guilt page up on my other web site, put some it into some search engines, and ads up some ads for it in some of the places that such folks might visit out of such desperation. {shrug} I got hurt again, a whole lot worse, when I fell on those same two disks again in Oct. of '96; and, after I started recovering enough to be able to do a little bit here and there, I started accepting more of these "guilt cases." Part of it was (admittedly) economic, part of it was a way to give some of the people I was training a chance to gain a little experience without having a prosecutor or judge breathing down our necks, and part of it was a need to feel useful at a time when my activities had been limited even further. Since I (otherwise) get by financially on a rather limited disability check (because of something called "traumatic fibromyalgia / myofascial pain syndrome," which developed as the result of the disk injuries, making me unable to hold up to any job where I'd have to be sitting or standing for any periods which were outside of my total control), accepting guilt cases makes it possible for me to continue my efforts to get changes made in the criminal justice system, by helping to keep the bills paid. Even if I didn't need the money, though, I believe I would continue working with guilt clients. Even more important than helping to keep the bills paid, I'm the sort of person who has to stay active and useful. I would find my physical situation intollerable if I were not doing this (or, something else which resulted in similarly dramatic outcomes.) I get a lot of satisfaction out of being a part of people getting their lives turned around, whether they be court-related or guilt clients. Court-related cases take far more time to set up and can fall through for reasons which are totally outside of my/my client's control. (Which can be extremely frustrating!!!) When working with guilt clients, there are fewer variables; so, the long hours I put into such "cases" are far more likely to result in moving forward to a favorable outcome. It would be nice if such outcomes could occur without the infliction of any pain (which does occassionally occur); but, I've come to accept that the corporal punishment phase of this process is usually an unavoidable component for obtaing the needed changes. Even though I don't get any sort of a kick out of whipping folks, I realize that it's a necessary component in either the court or guilt cases I take; so, I'm able to view it in much the same wa as I would view performing a painful dental procedure, if I were a dentist; or, pushing a physical therapy patient, if I were a physical therapist. In any of these three types of situations, what's done is done in order to prevent considerablly worse consequences from occuring to the person. There was a time when it bothered me quite a bit to have spend a lot of time getting to know a person; then, to be the one to whip them; but, this no longer bothers me, since I've had so many folks who've been helped and no one has been harmed by it. Even though I refuse (and will continue to refuse) to take any case where the person is really looking for a domme, isn't willing to do the written work involved, or is really suffering from guilt feelings that are the result of clinical depression rather than some specific and legitimate event in their past; and, even though I would never turn down a case that I was both justified in taking and able to work out a way to take, another factor in my continuing to work with guilt clients probably was having to turn down some court-related cases because they didn't have the money to cover the expenses involved and my having no way to cover them out of my own pocket, since I just barely keep ends meeting myself. Such situations REALLY bum me and make me less satisfied with just getting by financially; so, taking on more guilt cases seemed like an "everyone wins" situation. I'm definitely not going to "get rich" off of doing this, especially between letting folks do community service in place of paying me, people getting cases of cold feet and backing out on the day before they're to get here, etc.; but, if I can occassionally get "far enough ahead" that I can afford the gas to get to a court-related client that I'd otherwise have to turn away, be able to "piggy-back" a deserving court or guilt case who otherwise couldn't afford to get me to their area/get to Okla., etc.; I'm okay with that. Anyway, that's how someone who isn't into bdsm and doesn't enjoy hurting people wound up whipping folks on a rather regular basis. {smile} Most of it was a copy and paste; but, I hope that more of the pieces fit together after having read it. Even though what I do involves inflicting short-term pain, it's done with the intent of actually reducing (far worse) long-term pain. I'm a rather serious pragmatist, I have a background that's given me a fairly unique ability to help people, I have a fairly strong need to feel useful, and circumstances came together in way that I'm able to turn some of the more negative aspects of my life into a way of being rather uniquely useful. It beats the heck out of laying here and doing something like data entry, even though that would probably pay a lot more and leave me with some semblence of free time. {grin} (I'd probably go nuts from boredom, though.)